On 19 December, 2006 - Nathalie Poulet (IPSL) sent me these 1,4K bytes: > Hello, > After an export and an importation, the size of the pool remains > unchanged. As there were no data on this partition, I destroyed and > recreate the pool. The size was indeed taken into account. > > The correct size is indicated by the order "zpool list". The order "df > - k" shows a size higher than the real size. The order "zfs list" shows > a lower size. Why? > > # df -k > > data 3055288320 24 3055288244 1% /data
% echo 3055288320/1024/1024/1024 | bc -lq 2.84545898437500000000 Seems about the same. > # zpool list > > NAME SIZE USED AVAIL CAP HEALTH ALTROOT > > data 2,89T 184K 2,89T 0% EN LIGNE - > > # zfs list > > NAME USED AVAIL REFER MOUNTPOINT > > data 75,5K 2,85T 24,5K /data /Tomas -- Tomas Ögren, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.acc.umu.se/~stric/ |- Student at Computing Science, University of Umeå `- Sysadmin at {cs,acc}.umu.se _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
