[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> . . .
> We don't want to buy an Legato solution This will be overkill and is too
> expensive. Scripting with tar and other archievers is not the best solution
> for doing a backup. 

Gerrit,

It seems you/they must already be scripting with ufsdump now.  It's no
more difficult to do the same with tar, GNU tar, or Schilling's "star".
The latter two can do full & incremental backups with ZFS, even breaking
large backups onto multiple tapes.  It shouldn't be long before the "*tar"
solutions will backup/restore ZFS ACL's too, but you can still backup/restore
your data with these now.

And as others have pointed out, if the data is small enough to fit on
one tape, "zfs send [EMAIL PROTECTED] > /dev/rmt/0" will work now.  You
restore via "cat /dev/rmt/0 | zfs receive ...".  One _does_ miss the
very handy interactive (non-full) restore capabilities of "ufsrestore i".

Regards,

Marion


_______________________________________________
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss

Reply via email to