On Wed, Apr 04, 2007 at 10:08:07AM -0700, Adam Leventhal wrote: > On Wed, Apr 04, 2007 at 03:34:13PM +0200, Constantin Gonzalez wrote: > > - RAID-Z is _very_ slow when one disk is broken. > > Do you have data on this? The reconstruction should be relatively cheap > especially when compared with the initial disk access.
RAID-Z has to be slower when there is lots of bitrot, but it shouldn't be slower when a disk has read errors or is gone. Or are we talking about write performance (does RAID-Z wait too long for a disk that won't respond?)? _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
