Toby Thain,
I am sure someone will divise a method of subdividing
the FS and run a background fsck and/or checksums on the
different file objects or ... before this becomes a issue. :)
Mitchell Erblich
-----------------
Toby Thain wrote:
>
> >
> > It seems that there are other reasons for the Linux kernel folks
> > for not
> > liking ZFS.
>
> I certainly don't understand why they ignore it.
>
> How can one have a "Storage and File Systems Workshop" in 2007
> without ZFS dominating the agenda??
> http://lwn.net/Articles/226351/
>
> That "long fscks" should be a hot topic, given the state of the art,
> is just bizarre.
>
> --Toby
>
> >
> > Jörg
> >
> > --
> > EMail:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (home) Jörg Schilling
> > D-13353 Berlin
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (uni)
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (work) Blog: http://
> > schily.blogspot.com/
> > URL: http://cdrecord.berlios.de/old/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/
> > pub/schily
> > _______________________________________________
> > zfs-discuss mailing list
> > zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
> > http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
>
> _______________________________________________
> zfs-discuss mailing list
> zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
_______________________________________________
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
