>Those are interesting results. yes, indeed >Does this mean you've already written lzo support into ZFS? no, i`m not a "real" coder, but there exists an lzo patch for zfs-fuse which has also been discussed here, afaik. not sure if this has already been included in zfs-fuse tree - just wanted to check out, but website (http://www.wizy.org/wiki/ZFS_on_FUSE) seems down for the moment - if this takes longer to recover (happens often and normally doesn`t) maybe i have it left on my system somewhere where i tried zfs-fuse with lzo patch and where i did thos performance comparison.
also see: http://groups.google.com/group/zfs-fuse/tree/browse_frm/month/2007-04/541ff514ecc880b2?rnum=31&_done=%2Fgroup%2Fzfs-fuse%2Fbrowse_frm%2Fmonth%2F2007-04%3F#doc_a489f630aa4aa189 http://groups.google.com/group/zfs-fuse/tree/browse_frm/month/2007-04/b85b3bd20725fec6?rnum=11&_done=%2Fgroup%2Fzfs-fuse%2Fbrowse_frm%2Fmonth%2F2007-04%3F#doc_b85b3bd20725fec6 >If not, that would be a great next step if other performance comparisons give similar results, i really think so. not sure, if my results are reliable, but at least it`s worth taking a closer look, because also eric dillman told, it would perform better than lzjb - at least with zfs-fuse. >licensing issues can be sorted out later.. good attitude ! :) zfs-fuse author/maintainer is Ricardo Correia and the lzo patch was done by Eric Dillmann. I can provide contact data if you like. roland This message posted from opensolaris.org _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
