[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> it might be a faq or known problem, but it's rather dangerous, is this >> being worked ON? usb stick removal should not panic the kernel, should > it? > > I think the default behavior is that if the pool is unprotected (or at an > unprotected state via redundancy failure on mirror or raidz(2)) and you > lose a device the system panics. This is a known issue/bug/feature (pick > one depending on your view) that has been discussed multiple times on the > list.
discussed yes, I think I remember that, reported? being worked on? > -Wade thanx, Martin _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
