On 9/13/07, Eric Schrock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 13, 2007 at 07:54:12PM +0100, Peter Tribble wrote:
> >
> > There must be a better way of handling this. It should have just
> > brought it online first time around, without all the fiddling around
> > (that feels like voodoo to me).
>
> Yes, the devid should have prevented this from occurring in the first
> place. One interesting thing would be to run 'zdb -C' and see if the
> devid of the disk is now different from the email you sent previously.
It is. Previously:
guid=12723054067535078074
path='/dev/dsk/c1t0d0s7'
devid='id1,[EMAIL PROTECTED]/h'
whereas now:
guid=12723054067535078074
path='/dev/dsk/c1t0d0s7'
devid='id1,[EMAIL PROTECTED]/h'
So everything looks the same but the devid has changed. Is this
a consequence of having changed the raid controller?
--
-Peter Tribble
http://www.petertribble.co.uk/ - http://ptribble.blogspot.com/
_______________________________________________
zfs-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
