On Tue, Nov 20, 2007 at 11:10:20AM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> 
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 11/20/2007 10:11:50 AM:
> 
> > On Tue, Nov 20, 2007 at 10:01:49AM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > Resilver and scrub are broken and restart when a snapshot is created
> > > -- the current workaround is to disable snaps while resilvering,
> > > the ZFS team is working on the issue for a long term fix.
> >
> > But, no snapshot was taken. If so, zpool history would have shown
> > this. So, in short, _no_ ZFS operations are going on during the
> > resilvering. Yet, it is restarting.
> >
> 
> Does 2007-11-20.02:37:13 actually match the expected timestamp of
> the original zpool replace command before the first zpool status
> output listed below?

No. We ran some 'zpool status' commands after the last 'zpool
replace'. The 'zpool status' output in the initial email is from this
morning. The only ZFS command we've been running is 'zfs list', 'zpool
list tww', 'zpool status', or 'zpool status -v' after the last 'zpool
replace'.

Server is on GMT time.

> Is it possible that another zpool replace is further up on your
> pool history (ie it was rerun by an admin or automatically from some
> service)?

Yes, but a zpool replace for the same bad disk:
  2007-11-20.00:57:40 zpool replace tww c0t600A0B80002999660000059E4668CBD3d0
  c0t600A0B8000299966000006584741C7C3d0
  2007-11-20.02:35:22 zpool detach tww c0t600A0B8000299966000006584741C7C3d0
  2007-11-20.02:37:13 zpool replace tww c0t600A0B80002999660000059E4668CBD3d0
  c0t600A0B8000299CCC000006734741CD4Ed0

We accidentally removed c0t600A0B8000299966000006584741C7C3d0 from the
array, hence the 'zpool detach'.

The last 'zpool replace' has been running for 15h now.

> -Wade
> 
> 
> > >
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 11/20/2007 09:58:19 AM:
> > >
> > > > On b66:
> > > >   # zpool replace tww c0t600A0B80002999660000059E4668CBD3d0 \
> > > >   c0t600A0B8000299CCC000006734741CD4Ed0
> > > >   < some hours later>
> > > >   # zpool status tww
> > > >     pool: tww
> > > >    state: DEGRADED
> > > >   status: One or more devices is currently being resilvered.  The
> pool
> > > will
> > > >           continue to function, possibly in a degraded state.
> > > >   action: Wait for the resilver to complete.
> > > >    scrub: resilver in progress, 62.90% done, 4h26m to go
> > > >   < some hours later>
> > > >   # zpool status tww
> > > >     pool: tww
> > > >    state: DEGRADED
> > > >   status: One or more devices is currently being resilvered.  The
> pool
> > > will
> > > >           continue to function, possibly in a degraded state.
> > > >   action: Wait for the resilver to complete.
> > > >    scrub: resilver in progress, 3.85% done, 18h49m to go
> > > >
> > > >   # zpool history tww | tail -1
> > > >   2007-11-20.02:37:13 zpool replace tww
> > > c0t600A0B80002999660000059E4668CBD3d0
> > > >   c0t600A0B8000299CCC000006734741CD4Ed0
> > > >
> > > > So, why did resilvering restart when no zfs operations occurred? I
> > > > just ran zpool status again and now I get:
> > > >   # zpool status tww
> > > >     pool: tww
> > > >    state: DEGRADED
> > > >   status: One or more devices is currently being resilvered.  The
> pool
> > > will
> > > >           continue to function, possibly in a degraded state.
> > > >   action: Wait for the resilver to complete.
> > > >    scrub: resilver in progress, 0.00% done, 134h45m to go
> > > >
> > > > What's going on?
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > albert chin ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > zfs-discuss mailing list
> > > > zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
> > > > http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > zfs-discuss mailing list
> > > zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
> > > http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
> > >
> > >
> >
> > --
> > albert chin ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
> > _______________________________________________
> > zfs-discuss mailing list
> > zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
> > http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
> 
> _______________________________________________
> zfs-discuss mailing list
> zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
> 
> 

-- 
albert chin ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
_______________________________________________
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss

Reply via email to