Kam Lane wrote:
> I'm getting ready to test a thumper (500gig drives/ 16GB) as a backup store 
> for small (avg 2kb) encrypted text files. I'm considering a zpool of 7 x 5+1 
> raidz1 vdevs to maximize space and provide some level of redundancy carved 
> into about 10 zfs filesystems. Since the files are encrypted, compression is 
> obviously out. Is it recommended to tune the zfs blocksize to 2KB for this 
> type of implementation? Also, has anyone noticed any performance impacts 
> presenting a config like this to a non-global zone?
>  
>   
It depends on the read pattern.  If you will be reading these small
files randomly, then there may be a justification to tune recordsize.
In general, backup/restore workloads are not random reads, so you
may be ok with the defaults.  Try it and see if it meets your
performance requirements.
 -- richard

_______________________________________________
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss

Reply via email to