except in my experience it is piss poor slow... but yes it is another option that is -basically- built on standards (i say that only because it's not really a traditional filesystem concept)
On 1/14/08, David Magda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Jan 14, 2008, at 17:15, mike wrote: > > > On 1/14/08, eric kustarz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > >> On Jan 14, 2008, at 11:08 AM, Tim Cook wrote: > >> > >>> www.mozy.com appears to have unlimited backups for 4.95 a month. > >>> Hard to beat that. And they're owned by EMC now so you know they > >>> aren't going anywhere anytime soon. > > > > mozy's been okay, but only for windows/OS X. > > > > uploading can be slow sometimes... > > > > i do like rsync.net since it is a totally "standards based" solution, > > not proprietary. > > There's also Amazon's S3. Published APIs so you can use already > available utilities / libraries into whatever scripted solution you > can think of. > _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
