On Feb 6, 2008 6:36 PM, William Fretts-Saxton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Here are some performance numbers. Note that, when the > application server used a ZFS file system to save its data, the > transaction took TWICE as long. For some reason, though, iostat is > showing 5x as much disk writing (to the physical disks) on the ZFS > partition. Can anyone see a problem here? What is the disk layout of the zpool in question? Striped? Mirrored? Raidz? I would suggest either a simple stripe or striping+mirroring as the best-performing layout. _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
- [zfs-discuss] ZFS Performance Issue William Fretts-Saxton
- Re: [zfs-discuss] ZFS Performance Issue William Fretts-Saxton
- Re: [zfs-discuss] ZFS Performance Issue Marc Bevand
- Re: [zfs-discuss] ZFS Performance Issue William Fretts-Saxton
- Re: [zfs-discuss] ZFS Performance Issue William Fretts-Saxton
- Re: [zfs-discuss] ZFS Performance I... Will Murnane
- Re: [zfs-discuss] ZFS Performa... William Fretts-Saxton
- Re: [zfs-discuss] ZFS Performance I... Marc Bevand
- Re: [zfs-discuss] ZFS Performa... Neil Perrin
- Re: [zfs-discuss] ZFS Perf... Marc Bevand
- Re: [zfs-discuss] ZFS Performance I... Marion Hakanson
- Re: [zfs-discuss] ZFS Performa... William Fretts-Saxton
- Re: [zfs-discuss] ZFS Perf... Sanjeev Bagewadi
- Re: [zfs-discuss] ZFS ... William Fretts-Saxton
- Re: [zfs-discuss] ZFS ... William Fretts-Saxton
- Re: [zfs-discuss] ZFS Perf... Daniel Cheng