On Feb 6, 2008 6:36 PM, William Fretts-Saxton
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Here are some performance numbers.  Note that, when the
> application server used a ZFS file system to save its data, the
> transaction took TWICE as long.  For some reason, though, iostat is
> showing 5x as much disk writing (to the physical disks) on the ZFS
> partition.  Can anyone see a problem here?
What is the disk layout of the zpool in question?  Striped?  Mirrored?
 Raidz?  I would suggest either a simple stripe or striping+mirroring
as the best-performing layout.
_______________________________________________
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss

Reply via email to