Hello relling,

Thanks for your comments.  FWIW, I am building an actual hardware array, so een 
though I _may_ put ZFS on top of the hardware arrays 22TB "drive" that the OS 
sees (I may not) I am focusing purely on the controller rebuild.

So, setting aside ZFS for the moment, am I still correct in my intuition that 
there is no way a _controller_ needs to touch a disk more times than there are 
bits on the entire disk, and that this calculation people are doing is faulty ?

I will check out that blog - thanks.
 
 
This message posted from opensolaris.org
_______________________________________________
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss

Reply via email to