Hello relling, Thanks for your comments. FWIW, I am building an actual hardware array, so een though I _may_ put ZFS on top of the hardware arrays 22TB "drive" that the OS sees (I may not) I am focusing purely on the controller rebuild.
So, setting aside ZFS for the moment, am I still correct in my intuition that there is no way a _controller_ needs to touch a disk more times than there are bits on the entire disk, and that this calculation people are doing is faulty ? I will check out that blog - thanks. This message posted from opensolaris.org _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss