Hello Bob,

Sunday, July 20, 2008, 5:08:23 PM, you wrote:

BF> On Sun, 20 Jul 2008, Mattias Pantzare wrote:
>>>
>>> Is there a ZFS-specific method for doing that beats the heck of out tar, 
>>> etc?
>>> (RTFM indicates there is not; I R'd the FM :^).
>>
>> Use zfs send | zfs receive if you wish to keep your snapshots or if
>> you will be doing the copy several times. You can send just the
>> changes between two snapshots.

BF> The problem is that 'zfs send' likely preserves the existing block 
BF> size even if the target pool uses a different block size since it 
BF> operates at a low level which intends to preserve the original zfs 
BF> blocks.

I'm not 100% sure but it actually doesn't preserve recordsize.

-- 
Best regards,
 Robert Milkowski                            mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
                                       http://milek.blogspot.com

_______________________________________________
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss

Reply via email to