With the restriping: wouldn't it be as simple as creating a new
folder/dataset/whatever on the same pool and doing an rsync to the
same pool/new location.  This would obviously cause a short downtime
to switch over and delete the old dataset, but seems like it should
work fine.  If you're doubling the pool size, space shouldn't be an
issue.




On 8/31/08, Ross <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Personally I'd go for an 11 disk raid-z2, with one hot spare.  You loose
> some capacity, but you've got more than enough for your current needs, and
> with 1TB disks single parity raid means a lot of time with your data
> unprotected when one fails.
>
> You could split this into two raid-z2 sets if you wanted, that would have a
> bit better performance, but if you can cope with the speed of a single pool
> for now I'd be tempted to start with that.  It's likely that by Christmas
> you'll be able to buy flash devices to use as read or write cache with ZFS,
> at which point the speed of the disks becomes academic for many cases.
>
> Adding a further 12 disks sounds fine, just as you suggest.  You can add
> another 11 disk raid-z2 set to your pool very easily.  ZFS can't yet
> restripe your existing data across the new disks, so you'll have some data
> on the old 12 disk array, some striped across all 24, and some on the new
> array.
>
> ZFS probably does add some overhead compared to hardware raid, but unless
> you have a lot of load on that box I wouldn't expect it to be a problem.  I
> don't know the T5220 servers though, so you might want to double check that.
>
> I do agree that you don't want to use the hardware raid though, ZFS has
> plenty of advantages and it's best to let it manage the whole lot.  Could
> you do me a favour though and see how ZFS copes on that array if you just
> pull a disk while the ZFS pool is running?  I've had some problems on a home
> built box after pulling disks, I suspect a proper raid array will cope fine
> but haven't been able to get that tested yet.
>
> thanks,
>
> Ross
> --
> This message posted from opensolaris.org
> _______________________________________________
> zfs-discuss mailing list
> zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
>
_______________________________________________
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss

Reply via email to