On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 9:29 AM, Bob Bencze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Greetings. > I have a X4500 with an 8TB RAIDZ datapool, currently 75% full. I have it > carved up into several filesystems. I share out two of the filesystems > /datapool/data4 (approx 1.5TB) and /datapool/data5 (approx 3.5TB). THe data > is imagery, and the primary application on the PCs is Socetset. > The clients are Windows XP Pro, and I use services for unix (SFU) to mount > the nfs shares from the thumper. When a client PC accesses files from data4, > they come across quickly. When the same client accesses files from data5, the > transfer rate comes to a crawl, and sometimes the application times out. > The only difference I can see is the size of the volume, the data is all of > the same type. > > I could find no references for any limitations on the volume size of nfs > shares or mounts. It seems inconsistent and difficult to duplicate. I plan to > begin a more in-depth troubleshooting of the problem with dtrace. > > Has anyone seen anything like this before? > > Thanks. > > -Bob Bencze > -- > This message posted from opensolaris.org > _______________________________________________ > zfs-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss >
SFU NFS is often slow, but tunable, here is something you might find handy to squeeze some speed out of it: http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb463205.aspx HTH -- Brent Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
