The pools are upgraded to version 10. Also, this is on Solaris 10u6. # zpool upgrade This system is currently running ZFS pool version 10.
All pools are formatted using this version. Ben > What's the output of 'zfs upgrade' and 'zpool > upgrade'? (I'm just > curious - I had a similar situation which seems to be > resolved now > that I've gone to Solaris 10u6 or OpenSolaris > 2008.11). > > > > On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 2:11 PM, Ben Miller > <mil...@eecis.udel.edu> wrote: > > Bug ID is 6793967. > > > > This problem just happened again. > > % zpool status pool1 > > pool: pool1 > > state: DEGRADED > > scrub: resilver completed after 0h48m with 0 > errors on Mon Jan 5 12:30:52 2009 > > config: > > > > NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM > > pool1 DEGRADED 0 0 0 > > raidz2 DEGRADED 0 0 0 > > c4t8d0s0 ONLINE 0 0 0 > > c4t9d0s0 ONLINE 0 0 0 > > c4t10d0s0 ONLINE 0 0 0 > > c4t11d0s0 ONLINE 0 0 0 > > c4t12d0s0 REMOVED 0 0 0 > > c4t13d0s0 ONLINE 0 0 0 > > > > errors: No known data errors > > > > % zpool status -x > > all pools are healthy > > % > > # zpool online pool1 c4t12d0s0 > > % zpool status -x > > pool: pool1 > > state: ONLINE > > status: One or more devices is currently being > resilvered. The pool will > > continue to function, possibly in a degraded > state. > > action: Wait for the resilver to complete. > > scrub: resilver in progress for 0h0m, 0.12% done, > 2h38m to go > > config: > > > > NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM > > pool1 ONLINE 0 0 0 > > raidz2 ONLINE 0 0 0 > > c4t8d0s0 ONLINE 0 0 0 > > c4t9d0s0 ONLINE 0 0 0 > > c4t10d0s0 ONLINE 0 0 0 > > c4t11d0s0 ONLINE 0 0 0 > > c4t12d0s0 ONLINE 0 0 0 > > c4t13d0s0 ONLINE 0 0 0 > > > > errors: No known data errors > > % > > > > Ben > > -- This message posted from opensolaris.org _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
