Tony, On Wed, Feb 04, 2009 at 09:10:26AM -0800, Tony Galway wrote: > Thanks ... the -F works perfectly, and provides a further benefit in that the > client can mess with the file system as much as they want for testing > purposes, but when it comes time to ensure it is synchronized each night, it > will revert back to the previous state.
Another option would be to turn off atime if you are sure that you are not planing to modify anything on the destination box. But, like you mentioned above if you allow users to mess around with the FS then -F seems to be a better option. Regards, Sanjeev > > Thanks > -Tony > -- > This message posted from opensolaris.org > _______________________________________________ > zfs-discuss mailing list > zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org > http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
