Richard Elling wrote: >> >> # ./zilstat.ksh >> N-Bytes N-Bytes/s N-Max-Bytes/s B-Bytes B-Bytes/s B-Max-Bytes/s >> 376720 376720 376720 1286144 1286144 1286144 >> 419608 419608 419608 1368064 1368064 1368064 >> 555256 555256 555256 1732608 1732608 1732608 >> 538808 538808 538808 1679360 1679360 1679360 >> 626048 626048 626048 1773568 1773568 1773568 >> 753824 753824 753824 2105344 2105344 2105344 >> 652632 652632 652632 1716224 1716224 1716224 >> >> Fairly constantly between 1-2MB/s. That doesn't sound too bad though. > > I think your workload would benefit from a fast, separate log device.
Interesting. Today is the first I've heard about it.. one of the x4500 is really really slow, something like 15 seconds to do an unlink. But I assumed it was because the ufs inside zvol is _really_ bloated. Maybe we need to experiment with it on the test x4500. > > Highest recommended is what you need to get the job done. > For the most part, the defaults work well. But you can experiment > with them and see if you can get better results. It came shipped with 16. And I'm sorry but 16 didn't cut it at all :) We set it at 1024 as it was the highest number I found via Google. Lund -- Jorgen Lundman | <lund...@lundman.net> Unix Administrator | +81 (0)3 -5456-2687 ext 1017 (work) Shibuya-ku, Tokyo | +81 (0)90-5578-8500 (cell) Japan | +81 (0)3 -3375-1767 (home) _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
