Re: [zfs-discuss] ZFS: unreliable for professional usage?

[Miles Nordin]

>>>>> "rs" == Roman Shaposhnik <r...@sun.com> writes:
   
    rs>    1. as a forensics tool that would let you retrieve as much
    rs> information as possible from a physically ill device

a nit, but I've never foudn fsck alone useful for this.  Maybe for ``a
filesystem trashed by bad RAM/CPU/bugs'' it is useful, but for a
physically bad disk I've always had to use dd_rescue or 'dd bs=512
conv=noerror,sync' onto a good disk before pulling out the fsck.

pgpGeBh7okwQR.pgp
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss