thank you, caspar.

to sum up here (seems to have been a lot of confusion in this thread):
the efi vs. smi thing that richard and a few other people have talked
about is not the issue at the heart of this.  this:

> 32 bit Solaris can use at most 2^31 as disk address; a disk block is
> 512bytes, so in total it can address 2^40 bytes.
>
> A SMI label found in Solaris 10 (update 8?) and OpenSolaris has been enhanced
> and can address 2TB but only on a 64 bit system.

is what the problem is.  so 32-bit zfs cannot use disks larger than
1(.09951)tb regardless of whether it's for the root pool or not.

let me repeat that i do not consider this a "bug" and do not want to
see it "fixed".
_______________________________________________
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss

Reply via email to