On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 10:23:01AM -0700, Richard Elling wrote: > This line of reasoning doesn't get you very far. It is much better to > take a look at > the mean time to data loss (MTTDL) for the various configurations. I > wrote a > series of blogs to show how this is done. > http://blogs.sun.com/relling/tags/mttdl
Excellent information, thanks! I presume MTTDL[1] years and MTTDL[2] is the same as in http://blogs.sun.com/relling/entry/a_story_of_two_mttdl Do you think it would be possible to publish same information for 24 drives (not all of us can buy a Thumper), and maybe include raidz3 into the number crunch? Thanks! -- Eugen* Leitl <a href="http://leitl.org";>leitl</a> http://leitl.org ______________________________________________________________ ICBM: 48.07100, 11.36820 http://www.ativel.com http://postbiota.org 8B29F6BE: 099D 78BA 2FD3 B014 B08A 7779 75B0 2443 8B29 F6BE _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
