This is on Opensolaris 118b # zfs get all torstor/tor/fs NAME PROPERTY VALUE SOURCE torstor/tor/fs type volume - torstor/tor/fs creation Wed May 13 17:57 2009 - torstor/tor/fs used 1.51T - torstor/tor/fs available 5.19T - torstor/tor/fs referenced 1.35T - torstor/tor/fs compressratio 1.00x - torstor/tor/fs reservation none default torstor/tor/fs volsize 3T - torstor/tor/fs volblocksize 128K - torstor/tor/fs copies 1 default torstor/tor/fs refreservation none default torstor/tor/fs usedbysnapshots 161G - torstor/tor/fs usedbydataset 1.35T - torstor/tor/fs usedbychildren 0 - torstor/tor/fs usedbyrefreservation 0 -
torstor/tor/f...@zfs-auto-snap:tor_fs-2009-10-26-00:00 19.4G torstor/tor/f...@zfs-auto-snap:tor_fs-2009-10-27-00:00 3.79G torstor/tor/f...@zfs-auto-snap:tor_fs-2009-10-28-00:00 8.95G torstor/tor/f...@zfs-auto-snap:tor_fs-2009-10-29-00:00 3.93G torstor/tor/f...@zfs-auto-snap:tor_fs-2009-10-30-00:00 4.38G torstor/tor/f...@zfs-auto-snap:tor_fs-2009-10-31-00:00 1.84G torstor/tor/f...@zfs-auto-snap:tor_fs-2009-11-01-00:00 886M torstor/tor/f...@zfs-auto-snap:tor_fs-2009-11-02-00:00 1.09G torstor/tor/f...@zfs-auto-snap:tor_fs-2009-11-03-00:00 5.08G torstor/tor/f...@zfs-auto-snap:tor_fs-2009-11-04-00:00 1.68G The total space occupied by snapshots from the second print is far less than reported in the first (usedbysnapshots 161G) Why is there so big difference? -- Roman Naumenko ro...@frontline.ca -- This message posted from opensolaris.org _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
