Well I took the plunge updating to the latest dev version. (snv_127) and I 
don't seem to be able to remotely login via ssh via putty:

 

Using username "emilytg".
Authenticating with public key "dsa-pub" from agent
Server refused to allocate pty
Sun Microsystems Inc.   SunOS 5.11      snv_127 November 2008

 

Not good :(

 

Cheers,

Em
 


From: emilygrettelis...@hotmail.com
To: zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
Date: Sat, 21 Nov 2009 12:30:45 +1100
Subject: Re: [zfs-discuss] CIFS shares being lost



> by a Win7 client was crashing our CIFS server within 5-10 seconds.  
Hmmm thats probably it then. Most of our users have been using Windows 7 and 
people put their machines on standby when they leave the office for the day. 
Maybe this is why we've had issues and having to restart on a daily basis. It 
works fine during the day with no downtime.
 
Is it safe to update to the latest dev version? I know it creates a BE and we 
can revert to 2009.06 later but is there a way of just updating ZFS instead of 
downloading 800Mb more and updating the entire OS?
 
Cheers,
Em

 
> Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 18:14:06 -0700
> From: edmud...@bounceswoosh.org
> To: emilygrettelis...@hotmail.com
> CC: zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
> Subject: Re: [zfs-discuss] CIFS shares being lost
> 
> On Sat, Nov 21 at 11:41, Emily Grettel wrote:
> >
> > Wow that was mighty quick Tim!
> >
> > Sorry, I have to reboot the server. I can SSH into the box, VNC etc
> > but no CIFS shares are visible.
> 
> I found 2009.06 to be unusable for CIFS due to hangs that weren't
> resolved until b114/b116. We had to revert to 2008.11, as any access
> by a Win7 client was crashing our CIFS server within 5-10 seconds.
> 
> These were the suspected culprits:
> 
> http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/indiana-discuss/2009-June/015711.html
> 
> though I think there was another issue in b114 that wasn't resolved
> until b116.
> 
> Unfortunately, the zpool default version in 2009.06 is 1 iteration
> ahead of the one in 2008.11, so there's no smooth downgrade if you
> created your zpools with a 2009.06 image. We had started with 2008.11
> and not updated our zpool, so a re-install of 2008.11 worked.
> 
> The latest dev branch (b126-or-thereabouts, 2010.02 preview) is
> reportedly good for CIFS based on traffic from this list.
> 
> --eric
> 
> -- 
> Eric D. Mudama
> edmud...@mail.bounceswoosh.org
> 



Check out The Great Australian Pay Check now Want to know what your boss is 
paid?                                         
_________________________________________________________________
Looking for a date? View photos of singles in your area!
http://clk.atdmt.com/NMN/go/150855801/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss

Reply via email to