On 11/22/09 16:48, Tim Cook wrote:


On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 4:18 PM, Trevor Pretty <trevor_pre...@eagle.co.nz <mailto:trevor_pre...@eagle.co.nz>> wrote:

    Team

    I'm missing something?  First off I normally play around with
    OpenSolaris & it's been a while since I played with Solaris 10.

    I'm doing all this via VirtualBox (Vista host) and I've set-up the
    network (I believe) as I can ping, ssh and telnet from Vista into
    the S10 virtual machine 192.168.56.101.

    I've set smbshare on. But there seems to be non the the CIFS
    commands you get in OpenSolaris and when I point a file browser (or
    whatever it's called in Windows) at \\192.168.56.101 I can't access it.

    I would also expect a file name in .zfs/share like it says in the
    man pages, but there is non.

    What have I missed? RTFMs more than welcome :-)


    Details.....

    bash-3.00# zfs get sharesmb sam_pool/backup
    NAME             PROPERTY  VALUE     SOURCE
    sam_pool/backup  sharesmb  on        local


    bash-3.00# ls -al /sam_pool/backup/.zfs
    total 3
    dr-xr-xr-x   3 root     root           3 Aug 11 14:26 .
    drwxr-xr-x   2 root     root           8 Aug 18 09:52 ..
    dr-xr-xr-x   2 root     root           2 Aug 11 14:26 snapshot


    bash-3.00# ifconfig -a
    lo0: flags=2001000849<UP,LOOPBACK,RUNNING,MULTICAST,IPv4,VIRTUAL>
    mtu 8232 index 1
          inet 127.0.0.1 netmask ff000000
    e1000g0: flags=1004843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST,DHCP,IPv4> mtu
    1500 index 2
          inet 192.168.56.101 netmask ffffff00 broadcast 192.168.56.255
          ether 8:0:27:84:cb:f5


    bash-3.00# cat /etc/release
                         Solaris 10 10/09 s10x_u8wos_08a X86
             Copyright 2009 Sun Microsystems, Inc.  All Rights Reserved.
                          Use is subject to license terms.
                             Assembled 16 September 2009


I thought I had heard forever ago that the native cifs implementation wouldn't ever be put back to solaris10 due to the fact it makes significant changes to the kernel. Maybe I'm crazy though.

...

--
--Tim

Yes, support for a native CIFS server involved significant change to the
file system interfaces in the kernel (vfs/vnode layer).  Backporting these
changes would break unbundled file systems.

        Rich
_______________________________________________
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss

Reply via email to