On Fri, Feb 05, 2010 at 11:55:12AM -0800, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
> On Fri, 5 Feb 2010, Miles Nordin wrote:
> >
> >    ls> r...@nexenta:/volumes# hdadm write_cache off c3t5
> >
> >    ls>  c3t5 write_cache> disabled
> >
> > You might want to repeat his test with X25-E.  If the X25-E is also
> > dropping cache flush commands (it might!), you may be, compared to
> > disabling the ZIL, slowing down your pool for no reason, and making it
> > more fragile as well since an exported pool with a dead ZIL cannot be
> > imported.
> 
> Others have tested the X25-E and found that with its cache enabled, it 
> does drop flushed writes, but is clearly not such a gaping chasm as 
> the X25-M.  Some time has passed so there is the possibility that 
> X25-E firmware has (or will) improve.  If Sun offers an X25-E based 
> device for use as an slog, you can be sure that its has been qualified 
> for this purpose, and may contain modified firmware.
> 
> The 'E' stands for "Extreme" and not "Enterprise" as some tend to 
> believe.
> 

I missed out on this thread.  How would these dropped flushed writes
manifest themselves?  Something in the logs, or just worsened
performance?

Ray
_______________________________________________
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss

Reply via email to