> What would be useful though is to be able to easily disable ZIL per > dataset instead of OS wide switch. > This feature has already been coded and tested and awaits a formal > process to be completed in order to get integrated. > Should be rather sooner than later.
I agree. > > You'd be better off getting NetApp > > > Well, spend some extra money on a really fast NVRAM solution for ZIL and > you will get much faster ZFS environment than NetApp and still you will > spend much less money. Not to mention all the extra flexibity compared > to NetApp. Do you have a concrete recommendation we could use in the x4540 instead of the F20? -- This message posted from opensolaris.org _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
