> On Thu, 29 Apr 2010, Tonmaus wrote: > > > Recommending to not using scrub doesn't even qualify as a > > workaround, in my regard. > > As a devoted believer in the power of scrub, I believe that after the > > OS, power supplies, and controller have been verified to function with > a good scrubbing, if there is more than one level of redundancy, > scrubs are not really warranted. With just one level of redundancy it > > becomes much more important to verify that both copies were written to > disk correctly.
The scrub should still be available without slowing down the system to something barely usable - that's why it's there. Adding new layers of security is nice, but dropping scrub because of OS bugs is rather ugly roy _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
