<blockquote>It would be helpful if you posted more information about your 
configuration. 
Numbers *are* useful too, but minimally, describing your setup, use case, 
the hardware and other such facts would provide people a place to start. 

There are much brighter stars on this list than myself, but if you are sharing 
your ZFS dataset(s) via NFS with a heavy traffic load (particularly writes), 
a mirrored SLOG will probably be useful.  (The ZIL is a component of every 
ZFS pool.  A SLOG is a device, usually an SSD or mirrored pair of SSDs, 
on which you can locate your ZIL for enhanced *synchronous* write 
performance.)  Since ZFS does sync writes, that might be a win for you, but 
again it depends on a lot of factors.</blockquote>

Sure! The pool consists of 6 SATA drives configured as RAID-Z. There are no 
special read or write cache drives. This pool is shared to several VMs via NFS, 
these VMs manage email, web, and a Quickbooks server running on FreeBSD, Linux, 
and Windows.

On heavy reads or writes (writes seem to be more problematic) my load averages 
on my VM host shoot up and overall performance is bogged down. I suspect that I 
do need a mirrored SLOG, but I'm wondering what the best way is to go about 
assessing this so that I can be more certain about this? I'm also wondering 
what other sorts of things can be tweaked software-wise on either the VM host 
(running CentOS) or Solaris side to give me a little more headroom? The thought 
has crossed my mind that a dedicated SLOG pair of SSDs might be overkill for my 
needs, this is not a huge business (yet :)

Thanks for your help!
-- 
This message posted from opensolaris.org
_______________________________________________
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss

Reply via email to