http://blogs.sun.com/constantin/entry/csi_munich_how_to_save

2010/6/15 Scott Squires <ssqui...@gmail.com>

> Hello All,
>
> I've migrated a JBOD of 16 drives from one server to another.  I did a
> zpool export from the old system and a zpool import to the new system.  One
> thing I did notice is since the drives are on a different controller card,
> the naming is different (as expected) but the order is also different.  I
> setup the drives as passthrough on the controller card and went through each
> drive incrementally.  I assumed the zpool import would have listed the
> drives in the order of c10t2d0, d1, d2, ... c10t3d7.  As shown below the
> order the drives were imported is c10t2d0, d2, d3, d1, c10t3d0 through d7.
>
> __________________________________________________
> |Original zpool setup on old server:
> |
> |zpool status backup
> |  pool: backup
> | state: ONLINE
> |config:
> |        NAME         STATE     READ WRITE CKSUM
> |        backup       ONLINE       0     0     0
> |          raidz2     ONLINE       0     0     0
> |            c7t1d0   ONLINE       0     0     0
> |            c7t2d0   ONLINE       0     0     0
> |            c7t3d0   ONLINE       0     0     0
> |            c7t4d0   ONLINE       0     0     0
> |            c7t5d0   ONLINE       0     0     0
> |            c7t6d0   ONLINE       0     0     0
> |            c7t7d0   ONLINE       0     0     0
> |            c7t8d0   ONLINE       0     0     0
> |            c7t9d0   ONLINE       0     0     0
> |            c7t10d0  ONLINE       0     0     0
> |            c7t11d0  ONLINE       0     0     0
> |            c7t12d0  ONLINE       0     0     0
> |            c7t13d0  ONLINE       0     0     0
> |            c7t14d0  ONLINE       0     0     0
> |            c7t15d0  ONLINE       0     0     0
> |        spares
> |          c7t16d0    AVAIL
> |_________________________________________________
>
> __________________________________________________
> |Imported zpool on new server:
> |
> |zpool status backup
> |  pool: backup
> | state: ONLINE
> |config:
> |        NAME         STATE     READ WRITE CKSUM
> |        backup       ONLINE       0     0     0
> |          raidz2     ONLINE       0     0     0
> |            c10t2d0  ONLINE       0     0     0
> |            c10t2d2  ONLINE       0     0     0
> |            c10t2d3  ONLINE       0     0     0
> |            c10t2d1  ONLINE       0     0     0
> |            c10t2d4  ONLINE       0     0     0
> |            c10t2d5  ONLINE       0     0     0
> |            c10t2d6  ONLINE       0     0     0
> |            c10t2d7  ONLINE       0     0     0
> |            c10t3d0  ONLINE       0     0     0
> |            c10t3d1  ONLINE       0     0     0
> |            c10t3d2  ONLINE       0     0     0
> |            c10t3d3  ONLINE       0     0     0
> |            c10t3d4  ONLINE       0     0     0
> |            c10t3d5  ONLINE       0     0     0
> |            c10t3d6  ONLINE       0     0     0
> |        spares
> |          c10t3d7    AVAIL
> |_________________________________________________
>
>
> Is ZFS dependent on the order of the drives?  Will this cause any issue
> down the road?  Thank you all;
>
> Scott
> --
> This message posted from opensolaris.org
> _______________________________________________
> zfs-discuss mailing list
> zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
>



-- 
Frank Contrepois
Coblan srl
_______________________________________________
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss

Reply via email to