Did a search, but could not find the info I am looking for.
I built out my OSOL system about a month ago and have been gradually making
changes before I move it into production. I have setup a mirrored rpool and a
6 drive raidz2 pool for data. In my system I have 2 8-port SAS cards and 6
ports on the motherboard. I was short on SAS to SATA cables so I originally
built the system out using the 6 ports on the motherboard and one SAS to SATA
breakout cable. My new cables came and I reran all the cables to spread out
the drives between controllers...
Rebooted and my raidz2 pool is unavailable:
pool: tank
state: UNAVAIL
status: One or more devices could not be opened. There are insufficient
replicas for the pool to continue functioning.
action: Attach the missing device and online it using 'zpool online'.
see: http://www.sun.com/msg/ZFS-8000-3C
scrub: none requested
config:
NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM
tank UNAVAIL 0 0 0 insufficient replicas
raidz2-0 UNAVAIL 0 0 0 insufficient replicas
c4t16d0 UNAVAIL 0 0 0 cannot open
c4t17d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
c10t0d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
c10t2d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
c10t3d0 UNAVAIL 0 0 0 cannot open
c10t5d0 FAULTED 0 0 0 corrupted data
However,
when I look at format I see all my disks -- but the labels don't seem to match
up:
AVAILABLE DISK SELECTIONS:
0. c4t17d0 <ATA-SAMSUNG HD103SJ-0001-931.51GB>
/p...@0,0/pci1002,5...@3/pci1014,3...@0/s...@11,0
1. c4t18d0 <ATA-SAMSUNG HD103SJ-0001-931.51GB>
/p...@0,0/pci1002,5...@3/pci1014,3...@0/s...@12,0
2. c6t4d0 <DEFAULT cyl 19454 alt 2 hd 255 sec 63>
/p...@0,0/pci1002,5...@2/pci1014,3...@0/s...@4,0
3. c6t9d0 <ATA-SAMSUNG HD103SJ-0001-931.51GB>
/p...@0,0/pci1002,5...@2/pci1014,3...@0/s...@9,0
4. c10t1d0 <ATA-SAMSUNG HD103SJ-0001-931.51GB>
/p...@0,0/pci1462,7...@11/d...@1,0
5. c10t2d0 <ATA-SAMSUNG HD103SJ-0001-931.51GB>
/p...@0,0/pci1462,7...@11/d...@2,0
6. c10t4d0 <DEFAULT cyl 19454 alt 2 hd 255 sec 63>
/p...@0,0/pci1462,7...@11/d...@4,0
7. c10t5d0 <ATA-SAMSUNG HD103SJ-0001-931.51GB>
/p...@0,0/pci1462,7...@11/d...@5,0
How, do I recover my raidz2 pool?
Is what I did wrong? I was under the impression that zfs wrote a label to each
disk so you can move it around between controllers...?
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
_______________________________________________
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
