> From: Tim Cook [mailto:t...@cook.ms] > > Because VSS isn't doing anything remotely close to what WAFL is doing > when it takes snapshots.
It may not do what you want it to do, but it's still copy on write, as evidenced by the fact that it takes instantaneous snapshots, and snapshots don't get overwritten when new data is written. I wouldn't call that "not even remotely close." It's different, but definitely the same ballpark. _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss