On Sat, Aug 28, 2010 at 02:54, Darin Perusich <darin.perus...@cognigencorp.com> wrote: > Hello All, > > I'm sure this has been discussed previously but I haven't been able to find an > answer to this. I've added another raidz1 vdev to an existing storage pool and > the increased available storage isn't reflected in the 'zfs list' output. Why > is this? > > The system in question is runnning Solaris 10 5/09 s10s_u7wos_08, kernel > Generic_139555-08. The system does not have the lastest patches which might be > the cure. > > Thanks! > > Here's what I'm seeing. > zpool create datapool raidz1 c1t50060E800042AA70d0 c1t50060E800042AA70d1 > > zpool status > pool: datapool > state: ONLINE > scrub: none requested > config: > > NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM > datapool ONLINE 0 0 0 > raidz1 ONLINE 0 0 0 > c1t50060E800042AA70d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 > c1t50060E800042AA70d1 ONLINE 0 0 0 > > zfs list > NAME USED AVAIL REFER MOUNTPOINT > datapool 108K 196G 18K /datapool > > zpool add datapool raidz1 c1t50060E800042AA70d2 c1t50060E800042AA70d3 > > zpool status > pool: datapool > state: ONLINE > scrub: none requested > config: > > NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM > datapool ONLINE 0 0 0 > raidz1 ONLINE 0 0 0 > c1t50060E800042AA70d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 > c1t50060E800042AA70d1 ONLINE 0 0 0 > raidz1 ONLINE 0 0 0 > c1t50060E800042AA70d2 ONLINE 0 0 0 > c1t50060E800042AA70d3 ONLINE 0 0 0 > > zfs list > NAME USED AVAIL REFER MOUNTPOINT > datapool 112K 392G 18K /datapool
I think you have to explain your problem more, 392G is more than 196G? _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
