On Oct 19, 2010, at 4:33 PM, Tuomas Leikola <tuomas.leik...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 8:18 PM, Simon Breden <sbre...@gmail.com> wrote: >> So are we all agreed then, that a vdev failure will cause pool loss ? >> -- > > unless you use copies=2 or 3, in which case your data is still safe > for those datasets that have this option set. This doesn't prevent pool loss in the face of a vdev failure, merely reduces the likelihood of file loss due to block corruption. A loss of a vdev (mirror, raidz or non-redundant disk) means the loss of the pool. -Ross _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
