On Mar 18, 2011, at 21:16, Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk wrote:

>> I think we all feel the same pain with Oracle's purchase of Sun.
>> 
>> FreeBSD that has commercial support for ZFS maybe?
> 
> Fbsd currently has a very old zpool version, not suitable for running with 
> SLOGs, since if you lose it, you may lose the pool, which isn't very 
> amusing...

For commercial FreeBSD support:

        http://www.freebsd.org/commercial/commercial.html

ZFSv28 has been commited to HEAD / 9.x:

        
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2011-February/023132.html

and there's patches available for 8.x:

        http://people.freebsd.org/~mm/patches/zfs/v28/
        http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-fs/

Heck, ZFS on Mac OS X may be available (again) by this summer:

        http://tinyurl.com/68eg6bf
        
http://arstechnica.com/apple/news/2011/03/how-zfs-is-slowly-making-its-way-to-mac-os-x.ars

Oracle has said that they "will distribute updates to approved CDDL or other 
open source- licensed code following full releases of our enterprise Solaris 
operating system."

        
http://unixconsole.blogspot.com/2010/08/internal-oracle-memo-leaked-on-solaris.html

I guess we'll see what happens once Solaris 11 comes out officially.
_______________________________________________
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss

Reply via email to