On Apr 8, 2011, at 7:50 AM, Evaldas Auryla <evaldas.aur...@edqm.eu> wrote:

> On 04/ 8/11 01:14 PM, Ian Collins wrote:
>>> You have built-in storage failover with an AR cluster;
>>> and they do NFS, CIFS, iSCSI, HTTP and WebDav
>>> out of the box.
>>> 
>>> And you have fairly unlimited options for application servers,
>>> once they are decoupled from the storage servers.
>>> 
>>> It doesn't seem like much of a drawback -- although it
>>> may be for some smaller sites. I see AR clusters going in
>>> in local high schools and small universities.
>>> 
>> Which is all fine and dandy if you have a green field, or are willing to
>> re-architect your systems.  We just wanted to add a couple more x4540s!
>> 
> 
> Hi, same here, it's a sad news that Oracle decided to stop x4540s production 
> line. Before, ZFS geeks had choice - buy 7000 series if you want quick "out 
> of the box" storage with nice GUI, or build your own storage with x4540 line, 
> which by the way has brilliant engineering design, the choice is gone now.

Okay, so what is the great advantage
of an X4540 versus X86 server plus
disk array(s)?

Mark
_______________________________________________
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss

Reply via email to