On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 7:44 AM, David W. Smith <[email protected]> wrote: >> Generally, the log devices are listed after the pool devices. >> Did this pool have log devices at one time? Are they missing? > > Yes the pool does have logs. I'll include a zpool status -v below > from when I'm booted in solaris 10 U9.
I think what Cindy means is does "zpool status" on Solaris Express (when you were having the problem) has pool devices listed as well? If not, that would explain the faulted status: zfs can't find pool devices. So we need to track why Solaris can't see it (probably driver issues). If it can see the pool devices, then the status of each device as seen by zfs on Solaris Express would provide some info, >> My sense is that if you have remnants of the same pool name on some of >> your devices but as different pools, then you will see device problems >> like these. I had a similar case (though my problem was on Linux). In my case the "solution" was to rename /etc/zfs/zpool.cache, reboot the server, then re-import the pool. > Please let me know if you need more info... If you're still interested in using this pool under Solaris Express, then we'll need the output of format and zpool import when running Solaris Express. -- Fajar _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
