On Wed, Nov 09, 2011 at 03:52:49AM +0400, Jim Klimov wrote: > Recently I stumbled upon a Nexenta+Supermicro report [1] about > cluster-in-a-box with shared storage boasting an "active-active > cluster" with "transparent failover". Now, I am not certain how > these two phrases fit in the same sentence, and maybe it is some > marketing-people mixup,
One way they can not be in conflict, is if each host normally owns 8 disks and is active with it, and standby for the other 8 disks. Not sure if this is what the solution in question is doing, just saying. -- Dan.
pgpzJ4iippP0L.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
