On Wed, Nov 09, 2011 at 11:09:45AM +1100, Daniel Carosone wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 09, 2011 at 03:52:49AM +0400, Jim Klimov wrote:
> >   Recently I stumbled upon a Nexenta+Supermicro report [1] about
> > cluster-in-a-box with shared storage boasting an "active-active
> > cluster" with "transparent failover". Now, I am not certain how
> > these two phrases fit in the same sentence, and maybe it is some
> > marketing-people mixup,
> One way they can not be in conflict, is if each host normally owns 8
> disks and is active with it, and standby for the other 8 disks. 

Which, now that I reread it more carefully, is your case 1. 

Sorry for the noise.


Attachment: pgphTDpO9Oucq.pgp
Description: PGP signature

zfs-discuss mailing list

Reply via email to