On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 9:51 AM, Frank Cusack <fr...@linetwo.net> wrote:
> If you don't detach the smaller drive, the pool size won't increase. Even
> if the remaining smaller drive fails, that doesn't mean you have to detach
> it. So yes, the pool size might increase, but it won't be "unexpectedly".
> It will be because you detached all smaller drives. Also, even if a smaller
> drive is failed, it can still be attached.
Isn't autoexpand=off by default, so it won't use the larger size anyway?
zfs-discuss mailing list