2012-03-13 16:52, Hung-Sheng Tsao (LaoTsao) Ph.D wrote:
are the disk/sas controller the same on both server?
Seemingly no. I don't see the output of "format" on Server2,
but for Server1 I see that the 3TB disks are used as IDE
devices (probably with motherboard SATA-IDE emulation?)
while on Server2 addressing goes like SAS with WWN names.
It may be possible that on one controller disks are used
"natively" while on another they are attached as a JBOD
or a set of RAID0 disks (so the controller's logic or its
expected layout intervenes), as recently discussed on-list?
On Mar 13, 2012, at 6:10, P-O Yliniemi<p...@bsd-guide.net> wrote:
I'm currently replacing a temporary storage server (server1) with the one that
should be the final one (server2). To keep the data storage from the old one
I'm attempting to import it on the new server. Both servers are running
OpenIndiana server build 151a.
Server 1 (old)
The zpool consists of three disks in a raidz1 configuration:
# zpool status
c4d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
c4d1 ONLINE 0 0 0
c5d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
errors: No known data errors
Output of format command gives:
AVAILABLE DISK SELECTIONS:
0. c2t1d0<LSILOGIC-LogicalVolume-3000 cyl 60785 alt 2 hd 255 sec 126>
1. c4d0<ST3000DM- W1F07HW-0001-2.73TB>
2. c4d1<ST3000DM- W1F05H2-0001-2.73TB>
3. c5d0<ST3000DM- W1F032R-0001-2.73TB>
Server 2 (new)
I have attached the disks on the new server in the same order (which shouldn't
matter as ZFS should locate the disks anyway)
zpool import gives:
root@backup:~# zpool import
action: The pool cannot be imported due to damaged devices or data.
storage UNAVAIL insufficient replicas
raidz1-0 UNAVAIL corrupted data
zfs-discuss mailing list