On 2 Mar 2014, at 09:16, Philip Robar <philip.ro...@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Sat, Mar 1, 2014 at 5:07 PM, Jason Belec <jasonbe...@belecmartin.com> 
> wrote:
>> RAM/ECC RAM is like consumer drives vs pro drives in your system, recent 
>> long term studies have shown you don't get much more for the extra money.
> Do you have references to these studies? This directly conflicts with what 
> I've seen posted, with references, in other forums on the frequency of soft 
> memory errors, particularly on systems that run 24x7, and how ECC memory is 
> able to correct these random errors.

I don't have any reference to Jason's claims about ECC, but recently Backblaze 
published some stats on their experiences with a variety of drives. Jason might 
have been thinking about these:


They have lots more related articles on their blog that are well worth a read.



You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"zfs-macos" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to zfs-macos+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Reply via email to