On 2 Mar 2014, at 09:16, Philip Robar <philip.ro...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 1, 2014 at 5:07 PM, Jason Belec <jasonbe...@belecmartin.com>
>> RAM/ECC RAM is like consumer drives vs pro drives in your system, recent
>> long term studies have shown you don't get much more for the extra money.
> Do you have references to these studies? This directly conflicts with what
> I've seen posted, with references, in other forums on the frequency of soft
> memory errors, particularly on systems that run 24x7, and how ECC memory is
> able to correct these random errors.
I don't have any reference to Jason's claims about ECC, but recently Backblaze
published some stats on their experiences with a variety of drives. Jason might
have been thinking about these:
They have lots more related articles on their blog that are well worth a read.
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.