On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 3:52 PM, Svenn Are Bjerkem <svenn.bjer...@googlemail.com> wrote: ... 8< ... > Now I wonder what the motivation is to have additional markup language > support in zim?
Main argument is to use zim in combination with other software like an existing online wiki or existing text-to-html tools. Maybe it will not match as nicely with zim's features as the default syntax. But should be possible if there is a strong enough use case for people creating the parsers. ... 8< ... > Many markup languages have comment commands which does not show up in > the rendered text. If I could add a comment > // zim: no-touch > to the beginning of all my asciidoc files and zim would look for that > before it decides to include it in its structure, I would be happy. > This won't help for external files that I decide to put inside the > domain of zim, but most of the text files in my structure are made by > me. At the moment, I solve by using a different extension, but that > sometimes give the fileview plugin a tough time when I try to open > with an external application, as some extensions are assigned to > specific applications. You are describing a reversed version of how I want to do it. By excluding any text files that do *not* have the zim header from the index we achieve the same result and without touching other file formats. -- Jaap _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~zim-wiki Post to : firstname.lastname@example.org Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~zim-wiki More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp