On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 16:17, Adam Porter <a...@alphapapa.net> wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 13:33, Dotan Cohen <dotanco...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> However, Zim is a bit unpolished in some key areas and I feel that
>> these "paper cuts" should be addressed before actively promoting the
> Respectfully, I disagree. I generally support the idea, "Release
> early, release often." Zim is more a project than a product--and
> being a project, what we need are more interested parties who may
> contribute in whatever ways they can, including spreading the word.
> Zim is far beyond the point of being vaporware that needs to have
> something to show before releasing--it's a great tool right now. :)
If is to be promoted as a project in look of parties who may
contribute in whatever ways they can, then I agree. If Zim is to be
promoted as a product ready for end users, then I disagree.
I reiterate that my motivation is constructive criticism. I love and
appreciate Zim very much.
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~zim-wiki
Post to : email@example.com
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~zim-wiki
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp