On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 17:38, <hans...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 2:53 PM, Dotan Cohen <dotanco...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Possibly, and I appreciate your telling me that. I don't see where I >> have been forceful but I'm sure that you're right. I am certainly no >> diplomat! > > > It's quite possible to be fully honest and brutal about objective facts, > while expressing one's opinions with courtesy and tact, not least by clearly > distinguishing between the two domains. >
Thanks. Would you mind pointing out where I was without courtesy or tact? I agree that my approach could be improved. My own language has much less adjectives and synonyms than English, so I may be using words with negative connotation where words with positive connotation exist but I don't realise the difference. Thank you for identifying that the problem is with my style, and not with my intent. > Like Chris, I think you'll find if you look at the original file itself > outside of Zim, you'll find that your original content is intact (other than > the meta-header) > > It's just the rendering within Zim that makes it look different. > > Do let us know if that's not the case. > Thank you. I address this in my on-list reply a few minutes ago. -- Dotan Cohen http://gibberish.co.il http://what-is-what.com _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~zim-wiki Post to : zim-wiki@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~zim-wiki More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
