Hi Bruno, I did this on purpose because the items are not actionable yet. In my mind an open task always has more prio than a task that is not actionable yet. As soon as they start, they will show up at the appropriate prio level in the list.
How I understand your way of working, it sounds like you want to be warned earlier of upcoming tasks - would a solution be to just assign an earlier start date to tasks so they show up a bit earlier ? Regards, Jaap On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 1:44 AM Bruno C. Vellutini <organe...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Jaap and all, > > Tasks with a start date are placed on the bottom of the task list (see > attached file). Isn't it more natural to have the tasks with a start date > right after the tasks with a due date? > > I really enjoy how the tasks with due dates show the number of days/weeks > left when ordered by priority. It allows me to know with a glance what I > need to do and how much time is left. However, I often miss the tasks that > have a start date. They are out of my view on the bottom of the list, after > a bunch of undated tasks. > > At least in the way that I use the task list, undated tasks have lower > priority than a task with a defined start date. Even if the latter is not > actionable yet. > > What do you think? > > Cheers, > Bruno > > _______________________________________________ > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~zim-wiki > Post to : firstname.lastname@example.org > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~zim-wiki > More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp >
_______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~zim-wiki Post to : email@example.com Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~zim-wiki More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp