Cousin Bill wrote:

> The following article makes an argument against the United Nations that,
> thought I had never heard before, makes perfect sense, and leads me to
> wonder why I had never heard it before.  (I'm also slightly embarrassed that
> I had never thought of it before.)
> United Nations
> James Humes
> Wednesday, Oct. 23, 2002
> <<>>
> The argument in a nutshell:
> When did the United Nations become the supreme moral authority of the world?

It isn't. George Bush is. Or thinks he is. And we Canadians know we are the real
moral authorities.

Marc A. Schindler
Spruce Grove, Alberta, Canada -- Gateway to the Boreal Parkland

“We do not think that there is an incompatibility between words and deeds; the
worst thing is to rush into action before the consequences have been properly
debated…To think of the future and wait was merely another way of saying one was
a coward; any idea of moderation was just an attempt to disguise one’s unmanly
character; ability to understand a question from all sides meant that one was
totally unfitted for action.” – Pericles about his fellow-Athenians, as quoted by
Thucydides in “The Peloponessian Wars”

Note: This communication represents the informal personal views of the author
solely; its contents do not necessarily reflect those of the author’s employer,
nor those of any organization with which the author may be associated.

///  ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at  ///
///      ///

This email was sent to:

Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!

Reply via email to