But because bishop is an ordination in the first instance, I believe that's why we 
have the tradition of continuing to call ex-bishops by the honorific "bishop," but 
it's a tradition and is certainly not required. But because of this, when I talk to 
privately that's what I call him -- we're on a first-name basis from long before he 
was called to be bishop. But if other members are around, I call him "Bishop Gregson." 
 Likewise my boss, whose first name is Mel. And since working for him, that's what I
always call him, but when he was in the stake presidency, in the presence of other 
members (even my own family) I'd always address him as Pres. Wong. Likewise with Tom 
Matkin. We're coming down to southern Alberta before Christmas. If we were to invite 
to my brother's or my Dad's place, I'd call him Pres. Matkin. Likewise before his 
family. Only in private or here on the list would I call him Tom.

Mark Gregson wrote:

> -Larry-
> > Keys, where needed, are given to the person set apart for
> > a calling.  He only holds those keys until he is released.
> -Stephen-
> >How about that? That's directly opposite to what a bishop told me years back. 
>Thanks for the clarification.
> I concur with Larry.  An ordained bishop, if called again to lead a ward, even the 
>same ward he used to lead, will again be set apart as the bishop of that ward and 
>given the keys of a bishop.  Obviously, he is not ordained again to the office of 
> =========  Mark Gregson  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  =========
> --
> __________________________________________________________
> Download the FREE Opera browser at www.opera.com/download/
> Free OperaMail at http://www.operamail.com/
> Powered by Outblaze
> /////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
> ///  ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at  ///
> ///  http://www.zionsbest.com/charter.html      ///
> /////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////

Marc A. Schindler
Spruce Grove, Alberta, Canada -- Gateway to the Boreal Parkland

“We do not think that there is an incompatibility between words and deeds; the worst 
thing is to rush into action before the consequences have been properly debated…To 
think of the future and wait was merely another way of saying one was a coward; any 
of moderation was just an attempt to disguise one’s unmanly character; ability to 
understand a question from all sides meant that one was totally unfitted for action.” 
– Pericles about his fellow-Athenians, as quoted by Thucydides in “The Peloponessian 

Note: This communication represents the informal personal views of the author solely; 
its contents do not necessarily reflect those of the author’s employer, nor those of 
any organization with which the author may be associated.

///  ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at  ///
///  http://www.zionsbest.com/charter.html      ///

This email was sent to: archive@jab.org

EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?aaP9AU.bWix1n.YXJjaGl2
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!

Reply via email to