We didn't want to upset the UN, now, did we? Actually, we did have an agreement with Iraq to implement full inspections, and he did agree to get rid of all of the Iraqi WoMM, although I can't tell you why we believed him. But certainly, we can't now.
We are now more concerned because he has had quite some time to implement more weapons outside of our ability to inspect, and he has quite a bit of money to do so, given the trade he has with our European "allies" in the UN. But this was a rhetorical question, wasn't it? Of course, no one here on this list, including myself, can tell you what will be the short and long term outcome of acting or not acting. I believe that he is a continuing threat to our way of life, along with quite a few other gangsters. Others believe otherwise. Jon Stacy Smith wrote: > The thing that gets me is this: If we're all of a sudden so concerned > about Saddam's nuclear and biological weapons abilities, why weren't we as > concerned in 1992? ///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// /// ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at /// /// http://www.zionsbest.com/charter.html /// ///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// ==^================================================================ This email was sent to: archive@jab.org EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?aaP9AU.bWix1n.YXJjaGl2 Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail! http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register ==^================================================================
