Jewish World Review Nov. 27, 2002 / 22 Kislev 5763 
Thomas Sowell 

Gun Control myths: Part II

Talking facts to gun control zealots is only likely to make them angry. 
But the rest of us need to know what the facts are. More than that, we 
need to know that much of what the gun controllers claim as facts will 
not stand up under scrutiny.

The grand dogma of the gun controllers is that places with severe 
restrictions on the ownership of firearms have lower rates of murder and 
other gun crimes. How do they prove this? Simple. They make comparisons 
of places where this is true and ignore all comparisons of places where 
the opposite is true. 

Gun control zealots compare the United States and England to show that 
murder rates are lower where restrictions on ownership of firearms are 
more severe. But you could just as easily compare Switzerland and 
Germany, the Swiss having lower murder rates than the Germans, even 
though gun ownership is three times higher in Switzerland. Other 
countries with high rates of gun ownership and low murder rates include 
Israel, New Zealand and Finland. 

Within the United States, rural areas have higher rates of gun ownership 
and lower rates of murder, whites have higher rates of gun ownership 
than blacks and much lower murder rates. For the country as a whole, 
handgun ownership doubled in the late 20th century, while the murder 
rate went down. But such facts are not mentioned by gun control zealots 
or by the liberal media. 

Another dogma among gun control supporters is that having a gun in the 
home for self-defense is futile and is only likely to increase the 
chances of your getting hurt or killed. Your best bet is to offer no 
resistance to an intruder, according to this dogma. 

Actual research tells just the opposite story. People who have not 
resisted have gotten hurt twice as often as people who resisted with a 
firearm. Those who resisted without a firearm of course got hurt the 
most often. 

Such facts are simply ignored by gun control zealots. They prefer to 
cite a study published some years ago in the New England Journal of 
Medicine and demolished by a number of scholars since then. According to 
this discredited study, people with guns in their homes were more likely 
to be murdered. 

How did they arrive at this conclusion? By taking people who were 
murdered in their homes, finding out how many had guns in the house, and 
then comparing them with people who were not murdered in their homes. 

Using similar reasoning, you might be able to show that people who hire 
bodyguards are more likely to get killed than people who don't. 
Obviously, people who hire bodyguards already feel at risk, but does 
that mean that the bodyguards are the reason for the risk? 

Similarly illogical reasoning has been used by counting how many 
intruders were killed by homeowners with guns and comparing that with 
the number of family members killed with those guns. But this is a 
nonsense comparison because most people who keep guns in their homes do 
not do so in hopes of killing intruders. 

Most uses of guns in self-defense -- whether in the home or elsewhere -- 
do not involve actually pulling the trigger. When the intended victim 
turns out to have a gun in his hand, the attacker usually has enough 
brains to back off. But the lives saved this way do not get counted. 

People killed at home by family members are highly atypical. The great 
majority of these victims have had to call the police to their homes 
before, because of domestic violence, and just over half have had the 
cops out several times. These are not just ordinary people who happened 
to lose their temper when a gun was at hand. 

Neither are most "children" who are killed by guns just toddlers who 
happened to find a loaded weapon lying around. More of those "children" 
are members of teenage criminal gangs who kill each other deliberately. 

Some small children do in fact get accidentally killed by guns in the 
home -- but fewer than drown in bathtubs. Is anyone for banning 
bathtubs? Moreover, the number of fatal gun accidents fell, over the 
years, while the number of guns was increasing by tens of millions. None 
of this supports the assumption that more guns mean more fatal 
accidents. Most of the gun controllers' arguments are a house of cards. 

No wonder they don't want any hard facts coming near them.  
JWR contributor Thomas Sowell, a fellow at the Hoover Institution, is 
author of several books, including his latest, The Einstein Syndrome: 
Bright Children Who Talk Late. 
Thomas Sowell Archives 
 2002, Creators Syndicate 

///  ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at  ///
///      ///

This email was sent to:

Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!

Reply via email to