In fact, their clusters are in different areas than what we would call "racial".
That is, there are several from different parts of Africa, for instance, as well
as a totally different group for Melanesians (who used to be considered blacks by
LDS until DOM's time).
Jim Cobabe wrote:
> Stephen Beecroft wrote:
> What?! Is this suggesting the outrageous proposition that
> commonly-defined racial characteristics are <gasp!> genetically based?
> Spare your outrage, Stephen.
> The authors of the study _studiously_ refrain from using the term
> "race". Instead they characterize unique population groups as
> "clusters". One cannot help but notice, however, that the "clusters"
> indicated on the map correspond rather remarkably with traditional
> racial demographics, but that's beside the politically-correct point.
> One wonders if the authors might have been injured by such strenuous
> bending-over-backwards exertions. :->
> Mij Ebaboc
> /// ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at ///
> /// http://www.zionsbest.com/charter.html ///
Marc A. Schindler
Spruce Grove, Alberta, Canada -- Gateway to the Boreal Parkland
“Knowledge may give weight, but accomplishments give lustre, and many more people
see than weigh.” – Lord Chesterfield
Note: This communication represents the informal personal views of the author
solely; its contents do not necessarily reflect those of the author’s employer,
nor those of any organization with which the author may be associated.
/// ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at ///
/// http://www.zionsbest.com/charter.html ///
This email was sent to: email@example.com
EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?aaP9AU.bWix1n.YXJjaGl2
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!